Last Tuesday at 2:47 PM, I became a stranger in my own home.

I pulled into my driveway after a long day, pressed the garage door button on my phone, and… nothing. The app showed “connection error.”

Walked to the front door. Tried to unlock it with my phone. “Service unavailable.”

Tried to turn on the lights from outside to see if anyone was home. “Cannot connect to device.”

For twenty minutes, I genuinely wondered if I was at the wrong house.

Then it hit me: Amazon Web Services was having an outage. And apparently, my house lives in the cloud.

Welcome to Your Rental Home

Sitting in my living room that evening (after finding my wife’s hidden key), I had an uncomfortable realization:

This house doesn’t belong to me. It belongs to Amazon.

Not legally, obviously. I have the deed, the mortgage, the property taxes to prove ownership.

But functionally? My house can’t operate without Amazon’s permission.

Let me show you exactly what stopped working when AWS went down:

Basic Entry:

• Garage door opener (needed cloud permission to open)
• Smart locks (required server authentication to unlock)
• Security system (couldn’t disarm without cloud connection)

Essential Systems:

• Lights (controlled through Amazon’s servers)
• Thermostat (cloud-dependent temperature control)
• Security cameras (uploaded everything to remote servers)

Communication:

• Doorbell (processed video in the cloud)
• Intercom system (routed through internet servers)
• Even my damn mailbox sensor (yes, that’s a thing, and yes, it was broken too)

Who Really Lives Here?

Here’s what really bothers me: I’m not a homeowner. I’m a tenant in Amazon’s ecosystem.

If Amazon decides to:

• Shut down their IoT services
• Change their pricing model
• Have technical problems (like they did)
• Get acquired by a company I don’t trust
• Just have a really bad day

…my home stops being functional.

I pay the mortgage, but Amazon controls whether I can get inside.

The Bigger Dependency Problem

This isn’t really about smart homes. It’s about the fundamental architecture of our digital lives.

Everything requires permission from corporations to function:

Your smart TV needs permission from Samsung to show Netflix.
Your car needs permission from Toyota to start with your phone.
Your photos need permission from Google to sync between devices.
Your thermostat needs permission from Nest to maintain temperature.
Your life needs permission from corporations to function.

What “Smart” Actually Means

I always thought “smart home” meant “responsive to my needs and preferences.”

Turns out it means “dependent on corporate servers and surveillance.”

Real intelligence would be:

• Lights that turn on because YOU’RE home, not because Amazon says you’re home
• Locks that recognize YOU directly, not through cloud authentication
• Systems that get smarter by learning YOUR patterns, not by reporting your patterns to data brokers
• Technology that works better when you’re NOT connected to the internet

The Simple Ownership Test

Here’s a test for any “smart” device: What happens when the internet goes down?

If it stops working → You don’t own it. You’re renting functionality from whoever controls the servers.

If it keeps working (maybe even works better) → You’ve found technology that respects your agency.

Most “smart” devices fail this test spectacularly.

The Psychology of Digital Dependence

We’ve been conditioned to think that “connected” equals “better.”

But connection isn’t the goal - capability is the goal.

My 1950s manual thermostat has never failed me. It doesn’t need updates, cloud servers, or privacy policies. It just works, reliably, for decades.

My “smart” thermostat failed because a server in Virginia had problems.

Which one is actually smarter?

Building Better

The day my house forgot I lived there, I started researching local-first smart home systems.

Turns out there are people building home automation that actually serves homeowners instead of data brokers.

The setup process:

• Not as convenient as scanning a QR code and agreeing to terms of service
• Requires actually thinking about what you want your home to do
• Takes some technical effort upfront
• Forces you to understand and control your own systems

But once it’s running:

• Your home is smart because YOU made it smart
• No subscription fees, no cloud dependencies
• Privacy isn’t a concern because nothing leaves your house
• Your home automation serves your family, not Amazon’s business model

Your House, Your Rules

The question isn’t whether we should have smart homes.

The question is: who should they be smart for?

Smart for you and your family’s needs?
Or smart for the companies extracting data from your daily life?

The Local-First Alternative

What if your smart home worked like this:

Local Processing: All automation happens on devices in your house
Internet Optional: Connection enhances features but doesn’t enable them
Your Data: Nothing about your life gets uploaded anywhere
Your Control: You decide what connects to what, when, and how
Your Rules: Automation serves your family’s needs, not corporate surveillance

This isn’t fantasy. The technology exists today.

The Choice

Every “smart” device you buy is a choice about who controls your home.

Buy cloud-dependent devices → Your home serves corporate surveillance
Choose local-first alternatives → Your home serves your family

That old metal key under the fake rock taught me something important: the most reliable technologies are the ones that work for you, period.

Maybe it’s time for our digital tools to be more like that key, and less like rental agreements with corporations that can evict us at any time.

---

Ready to build technology that serves your family instead of surveilling them? Join the movement for personal digital sovereignty.